Microplastic Cleanse Protocol & How to Indentify

The pervasive presence of microplastics in our environment has become an increasingly alarming global concern, with these tiny plastic particles infiltrating every aspect of our world and our bodies. Recent studies have revealed the shocking ubiquity of microplastics, from the peaks of Mount Everest to the depths of the Mariana Trench, and even within human bloodstreams, lung tissue, and placentas. These discoveries have not only captured public attention but have also intensified scientific scrutiny of this modern-day pollutant.

Microplastics, defined as plastic particles less than 5 millimeters in size but larger than 1 micrometer, are often smaller than the finest grain of sand or a fraction of a human hair’s width. Their diverse composition, varying in shape, size, and chemical makeup, makes them a complex subject of study. Researchers have detected these particles in the air we breathe, the dust in our homes, and the food we consume, including shellfish and other grocery store items. A recent study has further highlighted the severity of the issue, revealing that bottled water contains up to 100 times more nanoplastics than previously estimated, with an average of nearly a quarter of a million nanoplastic particles per liter.

The potential health implications of this widespread contamination are particularly concerning. Scientists like Dick Vethaak warn that the smallest microplastic particles pose the greatest risk, as they may be capable of penetrating deep into the body and bypassing protective biological membranes. This ability to infiltrate our bodies at a cellular level raises significant concerns about potential long-term effects on human health. However, the World Health Organization cautions that while the ubiquity of these particles is clear, there is still a lack of conclusive evidence regarding their impact on human health.

The scale of microplastic pollution is daunting and continues to grow. Plastic production has increased exponentially since 1950, and scientists warn that microplastic concentrations may continue to rise in the coming decades. This pervasive contamination extends beyond our bodies and into our agricultural systems. Microplastics have been found in sewage sludge used as fertilizer, potentially contaminating farmlands and the food we grow. Even attempts to mitigate the problem through the use of “biodegradable” plastics may inadvertently exacerbate it, as these materials often break down into smaller plastic pieces rather than fully decomposing.

Microplastics, the tiny plastic particles infiltrating our environment, originate from a diverse array of sources, each contributing to the growing pollution crisis. These minuscule fragments, typically less than 5 millimeters in size, are derived from larger plastic items and enter our ecosystems through various pathways.

Single-use plastics, ubiquitous in modern life, are a significant source of microplastics. Items like plastic bags, bottles, food packaging, and even disposable face masks contain synthetic materials that don’t biodegrade. Instead, they undergo photodegradation, a process where UV rays from the sun break down the plastic molecules into smaller particles. A plastic bag, used for a mere 12 minutes on average, can take centuries to photodegrade, continuously shedding microplastics into the environment throughout its lengthy decomposition process.

Personal care products represent another substantial source of microplastics. A 2020 study revealed that 70% of cosmetics and personal care items contained microbeads, predominantly made from polyethylene (PE). Manufacturers intentionally add these tiny plastic particles to improve texture, durability, and exfoliating properties in products like shampoos, creams, and cosmetics. These microplastics are readily washed away after use, with an estimated 37 billion microbeads entering the environment annually through wastewater.

Clothing, particularly those made from synthetic materials like polyester, acrylic, and nylon, is a major contributor to microplastic pollution. These fabrics release tiny plastic fibers throughout their lifecycle, especially during washing and drying. The UN Environment Programme estimates that laundry alone releases half a million tons of plastic microfibres into the ocean each year. The fast fashion industry exacerbates this issue, with its emphasis on synthetic materials and rapid production leading to higher levels of microfibre release and quicker disposal of garments.

Construction materials, including concrete, paints, and plastic building components, also contribute significantly to microplastic pollution. Paint, in particular, has been identified as one of the most substantial sources of ocean microplastics, accounting for 58% of particles found in the sea. The mismanagement of these materials during construction not only impacts the environment but also poses health risks to workers who may inhale airborne plastic particles.

Ocean-based activities, such as fishing and shipping, are responsible for up to 20% of microplastics in marine environments. Discarded fishing nets and other plastic debris not only pose immediate threats to marine life but also break down over time, adding to the accumulation of microplastics in our oceans.

Recent studies have shed light on the alarming amount of microplastics we unknowingly consume daily. Research suggests that the average person may ingest anywhere from 70,000 to 121,000 microplastic particles per year, which translates to roughly 190 to 330 particles daily. To put this into perspective, imagine a small pile of salt grains on your plate – that’s approximately the size and quantity of microplastics you might be consuming in a day.

The sources of these microplastics are diverse, ranging from drinking water (both bottled and tap) to seafood, salt, beer, honey, and even the air we breathe. A striking comparison often cited is that we may be ingesting about 5 grams of plastic every week, equivalent to eating a credit card. This amount, while small in appearance, is significant when considering the potential long-term health implications. The size of these microplastics can vary greatly, but many are smaller than 5 millimeters, with some being as tiny as 1 micrometer – about the width of a human hair split into 50 pieces. This microscopic size allows them to permeate our food and water sources easily, making them a pervasive and challenging environmental contaminant to avoid or eliminate from our daily intake.

Microplastics have been a part of our environment for decades, but their detrimental impacts have only recently come into sharp focus. While long-term studies are still needed to fully comprehend their effects, current research has already revealed several concerning impacts.

Soil contamination is a significant issue associated with microplastics. As plastics in overflowing landfills break down, they release microplastics that seep into the surrounding soil. Studies have shown that these particles can degrade soil structure, hampering water filtration and irrigation processes. This degradation can adversely affect crop growth and impede the natural regeneration of landscapes. Moreover, soil-dwelling organisms like worms ingest these microplastics, facilitating their entry into the food chain. https://enveurope.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s12302-014-0012-7

Water supply contamination is another major concern. Microplastics have been detected in lakes and rivers worldwide, with conventional wastewater treatment plants often failing to completely remove these particles. Primary wastewater treatment typically eliminates between 16.5 and 98.4% of microplastics, leaving a significant amount to potentially enter freshwater systems. Additionally, plastic waste in rivers and lakes gradually breaks down into microplastics, further contaminating water sources.

Alarmingly, microplastics have also infiltrated drinking water supplies, including both tap and bottled water. While some plastic particles are present in water sources before treatment, microplastics can also leach from containers into the water. A study in early 2024 revealed that bottled water contained up to 240,000 tiny pieces of plastic per liter, with 90% being nanoplastics – a significantly higher concentration compared to tap water.

Marine ecosystems are particularly vulnerable to microplastic pollution. As these particles accumulate in oceans, they are ingested by various marine organisms, rapidly ascending the food chain. A 2021 scientific report found microplastics in 100% of the 240 specimens of fish, squid, and shrimp studied. Beyond threatening food sources, microplastics pose serious health risks to marine life. A 2022 study highlighted their negative impacts on marine animals, including altered feeding behavior, reduced fertility, and structural damage to fish intestines, liver, gills, and brain. https://blog.cleanhub.com/what-is-ocean-bound-plastic

These findings underscore the urgent need for comprehensive research and effective solutions to address the pervasive issue of microplastic pollution. As we continue to uncover the far-reaching impacts of these tiny particles, it becomes increasingly clear that mitigating microplastic contamination is crucial for the health of our ecosystems and, ultimately, our own well-being.

As we grapple with this issue, it becomes increasingly clear that avoiding microplastics entirely may be an insurmountable challenge. They’re present in our water, our salt, and even our beer. The question now isn’t just how to avoid them, but how to understand and mitigate their impact on our health and the environment. Researchers emphasize that we’re only at the beginning of understanding microplastics’ full impact, with comprehensive answers likely a decade or more away.

This looming increase in microplastic concentrations underscores the urgency of ongoing research to unravel the complex relationship between these particles and human health. As we continue to study and understand this pervasive pollutant, it’s clear that addressing the microplastic problem will require a multifaceted approach, combining scientific research, policy changes, and individual actions to reduce plastic use and improve waste management. The challenge is significant, but so too is the importance of finding solutions to protect our health and our planet from this invisible threat.

Plastic has revolutionized many aspects of our lives, offering benefits in various sectors, including healthcare and safety. However, the rapid production and disposal of plastic have led to significant environmental and health concerns. The long-lasting effects of existing plastic on human health are becoming increasingly apparent. Here are several ways plastic affects human health:

1. Respiratory Issues from Plastic Production: The manufacturing and improper disposal of plastic contribute to respiratory problems worldwide. Plastic production, involving the extraction of raw materials like crude oil and natural gas, is energy-intensive and contributes significantly to global carbon emissions. In 2019, the OECD reported that plastic production was responsible for 1.8 billion tonnes of carbon emissions globally, equivalent to 3.7% of the world’s emissions. Additionally, end-of-life plastic practices, such as burning, release harmful chemicals like polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) into the air, posing health risks and contributing to climate change.
2. Cellular Damage from Microplastics: Scientific studies have shown that microplastics can damage and kill human cells. A 2021 study examining human cells exposed to contaminated drinking water, seafood, and table salt revealed that microplastics caused cytotoxicity, allergic reactions, and tissue damage. While more research is needed to understand the long-term impacts, cell damage can weaken the immune system and potentially lead to cell mutations linked to certain cancers.
3. Potential Impact on Fetal Development: Microplastics have been detected in various parts of the human body, including the placenta. A 2021 study found microplastic particles on both the fetal and maternal sides of the placenta, originating from artificial coatings, paints, adhesives, and cosmetics. The potential impact on fetal development is a significant concern, with reports suggesting that babies have 15 times more microplastics in their bodies than adults.
4. Health Risks from “Forever Chemicals”: Perfluorinated and polyfluorinated substances (PFAS), known as “forever chemicals,” are present in many plastic products and are harmful to human health. A study found that between 91,000 and 107,000 premature deaths in people aged 55-64 in the US were linked to phthalates, chemicals used to make plastic durable. These chemicals persist in the environment and can contaminate food supplies.
5. Ingestion of Plastic Particles: Humans are estimated to ingest approximately 53,864 plastic particles yearly from seafood alone. Microplastics have been found in various food and drink sources, including beer, fruits, and vegetables. Additionally, plastic particles can be absorbed through the skin from cosmetics and clothing made from synthetic materials.

These findings underscore the urgent need for more sustainable plastic production and disposal practices, as well as further research into the long-term health impacts of plastic exposure. As we continue to uncover the far-reaching effects of plastic on human health, it becomes increasingly clear that addressing this issue is crucial for the well-being of current and future generations.

Plastic particles pose significant threats to human health, often entering our bodies unnoticed due to their microscopic size. The main pathways through which plastic infiltrates our systems are:

1. Air Pollution Inhalation:
   Microplastics have been discovered in diverse environments, from the highest mountain peaks to the deepest ocean trenches, and even in clouds. When we breathe polluted air, these particles can enter our lungs and bloodstream, potentially causing health issues. The World Health Organization reported in 2019 that air pollution contributed to 4.2 million premature deaths worldwide, with waste management being a significant factor.
2. Food and Drink Consumption:
   Plastic particles travel up the food chain, eventually reaching humans through various dietary sources. Marine life is particularly affected, with research showing that fish in the North Pacific Ocean collectively ingest up to 24,000 tons of plastic annually. A quarter of fish in California food markets were found to contain plastic in their gut. Even plant-based diets aren’t immune, as studies have revealed high levels of microplastics in fruits and vegetables, particularly apples and carrots. Bottled water is another significant source, with an estimated average of 325 plastic particles per liter.
3. Packaging Contamination:
   The packaging industry accounts for approximately 39% of global plastic production. While plastic packaging is cost-effective and often necessary for sanitation, it can also be a source of microplastic contamination. Studies have shown that factors such as sunlight, heat, and physical stress can cause plastic packaging to degrade, shedding microplastics onto the contained products, including food items.

These pathways highlight the pervasive nature of plastic pollution and its potential impact on human health. The ubiquity of plastic in our environment and daily lives makes it challenging to avoid exposure completely. As research continues to uncover the extent and implications of microplastic contamination, it becomes increasingly clear that addressing plastic pollution is crucial for both environmental and human health. Efforts to reduce plastic use, improve waste management, and develop safer alternatives are essential steps in mitigating this growing global concern.

The ubiquity of microplastics presents a daunting challenge, but scientists are not without hope. Innovative research is paving the way for potential solutions to tackle this pervasive pollution. One promising avenue involves harnessing the power of nature itself. Certain fungi and bacteria have demonstrated a remarkable ability to consume and break down plastic, offering a biological approach to remediation. For instance, Aspergillus tubingensis, a fungus discovered in a Pakistani landfill, can degrade polyurethane in a matter of weeks. Similarly, Ideonella sakaiensis, a bacterium found outside a Japanese bottle-recycling facility, has evolved to eat PET plastic. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/business-57733178

Even more intriguing is the discovery of Zophobas morio, a species of mealworm that can subsist on a diet of polystyrene, potentially offering a way to address the vast amounts of styrofoam waste. Beyond biological solutions, engineers are developing advanced water filtration techniques, such as membrane bioreactors and advanced oxidation processes, which show promise in removing microplastics from water supplies.

Chemical treatments are also under investigation, with some researchers exploring the use of coagulants to aggregate microplastics for easier removal. A particularly innovative approach involves using magnets coated with carbon nitride to attract and remove microplastics from water bodies. This method, developed by researchers at RMIT University in Melbourne, could be scaled up for use in wastewater treatment plants. While these solutions are still in various stages of development and testing, they represent a growing toolkit in the fight against microplastic pollution, offering hope that we may yet find ways to mitigate this global environmental crisis.

While direct testing for microplastics in the body remains challenging, here are some more specific approaches your students could consider:

1. Symptom Tracking: Keep a detailed diary of symptoms that may be associated with microplastic exposure, such as:
   • Unexplained skin irritations or rashes
   • Frequent headaches
   • Digestive issues (bloating, constipation, or diarrhea)
   • Unexplained fatigue
   • Allergic reactions without clear triggers
2. Plastic Exposure Assessment: Document daily plastic use and exposure for a week, including:
   • Plastic food containers used
   • Plastic-packaged foods consumed
   • Time spent wearing synthetic clothing
   • Use of personal care products in plastic packaging
3. Diet and Lifestyle Elimination: Conduct a two-week elimination period:
   • Remove all plastic food containers and packaging
   • Avoid synthetic clothing
   • Use only glass or stainless steel water bottles
   • Eliminate personal care products in plastic packaging Note any changes in symptoms or overall well-being.
4. Water Quality Testing: Test home water supply for microplastics using commercially available water testing kits.
5. Urine BPA Testing: While not a direct measure of microplastics, elevated levels of BPA (a common plastic additive) in urine can indicate high plastic exposure.
6. Hormone Panel: Consider a comprehensive hormone panel to check for imbalances that could be related to endocrine-disrupting chemicals in plastics.
7. Inflammatory Markers: Test for general inflammatory markers like C-reactive protein (CRP) or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), which might be elevated due to chronic low-grade inflammation from toxin exposure.
8. Gut Microbiome Analysis: Assess gut health through comprehensive stool analysis, as microplastics may affect the gut microbiome.
9. Heavy Metal Testing: Some plastics can leach heavy metals. A heavy metal panel might provide indirect evidence of high plastic exposure.
10. Before-and-After Detox Protocol: Implement the detox protocol we discussed earlier and document any changes in energy levels, skin condition, digestive health, and overall well-being.

Remember, these methods are not definitive proof of microplastic-related health issues, but they can provide valuable insights into potential impacts of plastic exposure on individual health

What about detoxifying our bodies?

Addressing the growing concern of microplastic exposure, a comprehensive detoxification protocol can be developed, combining scientifically-supported methods with promising natural approaches. While it’s important to note that no method has been definitively proven to eliminate microplastics from the body, this protocol aims to support the body’s natural detoxification processes and potentially mitigate the effects of microplastic exposure.

Begin with hydration, consuming at least 2-3 liters of filtered water daily. This supports overall detoxification and helps flush toxins from the body. Incorporate a fiber-rich diet, aiming for 25-30 grams of fiber per day, which can be achieved through whole grains, legumes, fruits, and vegetables. Fiber aids in toxin elimination through the digestive system.

Cilantro, chlorella, and spirulina form a powerful trio in potential detoxification protocols, each offering unique properties that may aid in the body’s natural cleansing processes.

Cilantro, while not an algae like the other two, has been traditionally used for its potential detoxifying properties, particularly in chelating heavy metals. Start with 1-2 grams of fresh cilantro leaves daily, gradually increasing to 5-10 grams, easily incorporated into salads, smoothies, or as a flavorful garnish.

Chlorella, a single-celled freshwater algae, is renowned for its high chlorophyll content and potential detoxifying abilities. Begin with 1-2 grams daily, slowly increasing to 3-4 grams. Its tough cell wall may bind to toxins in the digestive tract, potentially aiding in their removal.

Spirulina, a nutrient-dense blue-green algae, completes this triad. Rich in proteins, vitamins, and minerals, spirulina is a powerhouse of antioxidants. Start with 1-2 grams daily, building up to 3-5 grams over time. Remarkably, a 7-gram serving of spirulina contains antioxidants equivalent to about 5 servings of fruits and vegetables, potentially helping combat oxidative stress caused by toxins like microplastics.

To implement this combined approach, begin with a total of 2-3 grams daily of these supplements together, gradually increasing to 5-6 grams total daily over several weeks. For example, you might consume 2 grams each of chlorella, spirulina, and fresh cilantro daily. While these natural substances show promise in supporting overall health and detoxification processes, it’s important to view them as part of a broader strategy that includes a balanced diet, proper hydration, and conscious efforts to reduce plastic exposure in daily life.

Probiotics play a crucial role in gut health and potential toxin breakdown. Aim for 10-20 billion CFUs daily through supplements or fermented foods like fire cider, kimchi, sauerkraut, or kefir. A cup of kimchi can contain up to 2.6 billion CFUs of beneficial bacteria.

Activated charcoal, known for its toxin-binding properties, can be taken periodically at a dose of 1-2 grams, away from meals and other supplements. However, it’s important to use this sparingly as it can interfere with nutrient absorption. There’s no natural food equivalent for activated charcoal, as it’s a processed form of carbon.

Diindolylmethane (DIM) is a natural compound formed in the body when indole-3-carbinol (I3C), found in cruciferous vegetables, is digested. It’s known for its potential to support hormone balance and aid in the metabolism of xenoestrogens, including certain plastics and environmental pollutants. While DIM isn’t directly found in nature, it’s produced when we consume cruciferous vegetables containing glucobrassicin, which breaks down into I3C during digestion and is then converted to DIM in the stomach’s acidic environment.

To obtain DIM naturally, focus on consuming a variety of cruciferous vegetables:

1. Broccoli: 1 cup (91g) contains about 27mg of I3C
2. Cauliflower: 1 cup (107g) provides approximately 22mg of I3C
3. Brussels sprouts: 1 cup (88g) offers around 24mg of I3C
4. Kale: 1 cup (67g) contains about 67mg of I3C
5. Cabbage: 1 cup (89g) provides roughly 20mg of I3C
6. Other sources include bok choy, collard greens, and watercress

To maximize potential benefits, consume these vegetables raw or lightly steamed, chew thoroughly, and eat them with a source of healthy fat to improve nutrient absorption.

The typical supplemental dose of DIM ranges from 100-200mg daily. However, the conversion rate from I3C to DIM in the body is approximately 10-20%. To aim for the lower end of the supplemental DIM range (100mg), you would need to consume about 500-1000mg of I3C from food sources daily. This translates to:

• 4-5 cups (360-450g) of broccoli, or
• 5-6 cups (535-642g) of cauliflower, or
• 4-5 cups (352-440g) of Brussels sprouts, or
• 1.5-2 cups (100-134g) of kale, or
• 5-6 cups (445-534g) of cabbage

A more practical approach is to aim for a diverse mix of these vegetables throughout the day. For example:

• 1 cup of broccoli with lunch
• 1 cup of cauliflower as a snack
• 1 cup of kale in a salad with dinner
• 1/2 cup of Brussels sprouts as a side dish

This diverse approach provides a good amount of I3C while ensuring a variety of other beneficial nutrients. While this level of vegetable consumption might seem high, it aligns well with general nutrition recommendations of 5-9 servings of fruits and vegetables daily for optimal health.

Remember, the goal is not to exactly match supplement levels, but to provide your body with a consistent, natural source of these beneficial compounds. By incorporating these vegetables into your daily diet, you can support your body’s natural production of DIM, potentially aiding in hormone balance and the metabolism of environmental estrogens, including those from certain plastics.

Calcium D-Glucarate is a compound that supports the body’s natural detoxification process, specifically the glucuronidation pathway. This pathway is crucial for the elimination of various toxins, hormones, and potentially harmful substances, including some plastics and their byproducts.

Calcium D-Glucarate is formed from glucaric acid, which is found naturally in many fruits and vegetables. When consumed, it’s converted into D-glucaro-1,4-lactone in the body, which inhibits beta-glucuronidase, an enzyme that can interfere with the detoxification process.

Natural sources of glucaric acid include:

1. Apples: One medium apple contains approximately 350mg of glucaric acid
2. Grapefruit: Half a grapefruit provides about 440mg of glucaric acid
3. Oranges: One medium orange offers around 180mg of glucaric acid
4. Broccoli: One cup of chopped broccoli contains about 350mg of glucaric acid
5. Brussels sprouts: One cup provides approximately 470mg of glucaric acid
6. Potatoes: One medium potato offers about 140mg of glucaric acid
7. Bean sprouts: One cup contains around 75mg of glucaric acid

To achieve the equivalent of a supplemental dose (1,500-3,000 mg daily) through diet alone, you would need to consume a significant amount of these foods. For example:

• 4-8 medium apples, or
• 3-7 halves of grapefruit, or
• 8-16 medium oranges, or
• 4-8 cups of chopped broccoli, or
• 3-6 cups of Brussels sprouts

A more practical approach would be to incorporate a variety of these foods into your daily diet. For instance:

• 1 medium apple with breakfast
• Half a grapefruit as a mid-morning snack
• 1 cup of broccoli with lunch
• 1 medium orange as an afternoon snack
• 1 cup of Brussels sprouts with dinner

This diverse approach would provide a good amount of glucaric acid while also ensuring a variety of other beneficial nutrients. It’s important to note that the body’s ability to convert glucaric acid to Calcium D-Glucarate and then to D-glucaro-1,4-lactone may vary between individuals.

While achieving supplemental doses through diet alone may be challenging, consistently incorporating these foods into your diet can support your body’s natural detoxification processes. The glucaric acid from these natural sources, combined with their fiber content and other phytonutrients, may offer additional health benefits beyond what a isolated supplement could provide.

Remember, the goal is to support your body’s natural detoxification pathways through a balanced, nutrient-rich diet. By regularly including these fruits and vegetables in your meals, you can provide your body with a natural source of glucaric acid, potentially aiding in the elimination of toxins and harmful substances, including those from certain plastics.

Lastly, support liver function with milk thistle extract, taking 150-300 mg standardized to 70-80% silymarin content daily. For a natural alternative, dandelion root tea can be consumed, with 2-3 cups daily potentially offering liver support.

Of Course, the most effective strategy remains reducing plastic exposure through lifestyle changes and supporting broader initiatives to decrease plastic pollution.